Firebolt
★★★★★ 4.0 · 1 Review
What is Firebolt?
The #1 platform for big data warehousing experts. Sub-sec query performance has never been easier and more cost effective.
Alternatives to Firebolt
Yellowbrick DataSpotlightYellowbrick Data empowers companies to make faster decisions with all of their data. Built for enterprises and the hybrid cloud… Learn more about Yellowbrick Data.
OnehouseSpotlightOnehouse is a cloud-based data management solution built on Apache Hudi, which provides a managed lakehouse service. It combines… Learn more about Onehouse.
Hevo DataSpotlightHevo is a no-code data pipeline platform that helps you integrate, clean, enrich, and bring together data from multiple data… Learn more about Hevo Data.
CensusSpotlightCensus proudly asserts its position as the preeminent Data Activation platform, leveraging the potent capabilities of Reverse… Learn more about Census.
EstuaryStruggling to access your data in real-time? Estuary eliminates the need for complex infrastructure management. Effortlessly… Learn more about Estuary.
LyftrondataLyftrondata is a data integration and data virtualization platform designed to streamline the process of data integration, data… Learn more about Lyftrondata.
Retail VelocityRetail Execution Solutions Developed for Manufacturers by Manufacturers Founded in 1994 by retail experts – one with a long and… Learn more about Retail Velocity.
SnowflakeSnowflake is the only data warehouse built for the cloud. Snowflake delivers the performance, concurrency and simplicity needed… Learn more about Snowflake.
Dimodelo SolutionsDimodelo Solutions is an innovative Business Intelligence consultancy and creator of Dimodelo Architect an agile Data Warehouse… Learn more about Dimodelo Solutions.
MNP ActiveSeriesMultichannel Solutions providers MNP created the ActiveSeries Suite to help drive success for your business. Our software… Learn more about MNP ActiveSeries.
Firebolt Reviews (1)
- ★★★★★0
- ★★★★★1
- ★★★★★0
- ★★★★★0
- ★★★★★0
Review Summary
Generated using AI from real user reviews
Firebolt's permission system is unusually granular and robust for a mid-market analytics tool, though its admin interface lags behind its underlying design.
Users praise the role hierarchies and engine-level controls that let teams manage contractor access and complex permission structures without constant rebuilds—a genuine strength across multiple reorganizations. The platform's query performance, cost predictability, and overall configuration flexibility also earn strong marks.
The main friction point is the admin UI for auditing access. While the permission model itself is solid and documentation is thorough, visualizing who has what access across multiple engines requires manual SQL queries and cross-referencing. It works, but adds unnecessary overhead for permission audits. This gap doesn't undermine the core system, but a dedicated audit view would meaningfully speed up operations.
★★★★★
Monday, December 1, 2025
“Permission management in a mid-market analytics department is messier than…”
Permission management in a mid-market analytics department is messier than anyone wants to admit. Role hierarchies, engine-level access controls, catalog permissions, keeping contractors scoped to just what they need without creating a support ticket every time someone needs a tweak. Firebolt handles most of this better than anything else I've managed in five-plus years of running data infrastructure. The granularity they give you at the engine and database level is genuinely impressive, and I've built out some fairly complex permission structures that have held up through two full team reorgs without me having to rebuild from scratch.
My one real frustration is the admin UI for permissions. The underlying model is solid, but the interface for visualizing who has access to what across multiple engines is thin. I end up cross-referencing SQL system tables more than I'd like just to audit access cleanly. It's not a dealbreaker, and their docs are thorough enough that I get there eventually. But a cleaner permission audit view would save me real time. Everything else, query performance, cost predictability, configuration flexibility, earns its keep.